Theory
For a perforated tube the hole diameter and wall thickness fix by bilinear interpolation in Elnady's measured table (Discharge coefficient C_D0); then gives the starting loss coefficient (Jet loss K0 (read-only)). The grazing correction is checked against the orifices Rogers and Hersh tested, mm and (Rogers and Hersh, 1975); outside, an advisory note is recorded with the K update.
For a thick perpendicular plate gives (Plate formula). When this card owns the hole diameter (a perforated tube, or a thick plate) the acoustic section of the card does not ask for it again (Hole diameter (acoustics)).
Equations
| where | meaning | unit |
|---|---|---|
| Hole diameter | m | |
| Wall thickness | m | |
| No-grazing discharge coefficient | - | |
| Open-area ratio | - | |
| Starting loss coefficient of the tube | - |
Default and rule
- Default
- none stored; the card pre-fills 3 mm
- Rule
None is stored for a new perforated wall; the card pre-fills 3 mm and saves what is shown. A perforated tube needs it unless a discharge coefficient is typed.
- Source
Table: Elnady's doctoral thesis (KTH 2004, Paper III, Table 1; the related paper is (Elnady et al., 2010)). Grazing range: (Rogers and Hersh, 1975).
Valid range d > 0; discharge table 0.6-5 mm, measured 0.6-2.4 mm
Table range
The table spans 0.6-5 mm; outside it the edge value is used. Elnady measured 0.6-2.4 mm; larger holes are his extrapolation (above 2.5 mm depends on the thickness only). The card says when either applies.
Grazing data
Rogers and Hersh measured holes of 1-12.7 mm; a hole outside that range gets a note in the run's K-update log (logs/perforate_k.json).
Related 5
References 2
- Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
- Rogers, T. and Hersh, A. S. (1975). The effect of grazing flow on the steady state resistance of square-edged orifices. 2nd Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 75-493. DOI 10.2514/6.1975-493