SpectraSim Documentation
Parameter · 05 Boundary Conditions

Grazing Mach number (acoustics)

perforate.grazing_mach Step 05 · Boundary Conditions

The Mach number of the mean flow running ALONG the perforated wall. A grazing flow raises the resistance of the holes and shortens their end correction; the Elnady, Kirby & Cummings and Lee & Ih models use it.

Last updated

Theory

Flow grazing past a hole sheds a shear layer over it, which adds resistance and blows away part of the oscillating mass at the hole ends.

  • Elnady adds 0.3 Mg0.3\,M_g to the hole resistance (Elnady et al., 2010).
  • Kirby & Cummings use the friction velocity u∗u_* of the grazing flow, estimated from the grazing speed and the tube (or plate) diameter, equation (2) (Kirby and Cummings, 1998).
  • Lee & Ih use MgM_g directly in their regression (Lee and Ih, 2003).
  • The thin-plate baseline, Sullivan & Crocker and the cross-flow model ignore it.

On auto the grazing speed UgU_g is taken, in this order:

  • the tangential velocity of the mapped CFD field, averaged over the wall by area (acoustic medium mapped from the CFD, Acoustic medium);
  • the tube-core speed sampled by the perforate loss updates of the flow run (logs/perforate_k.json);
  • the total entered inflow divided by the cross-section of the perforated TUBE, Q/(πr2)Q/(\pi r^2), when the flow is on and the Mach estimate is enabled (a flat plate gets none);
  • 0 otherwise (acoustics only: enter the Mach number).

The source used is written in the acoustic log and the report.

Equations

Mg=Ugc,Ug=∑e∣Ue−(Ue⋅ne)ne∣ Ae∑eAe (mapped field),Ug=Qπr2 (estimate)M_g = \frac{U_g}{c}, \qquad U_g = \frac{\sum_e |\mathbf{U}_e - (\mathbf{U}_e\cdot\mathbf{n}_e)\mathbf{n}_e|\,A_e}{\sum_e A_e}\ \text{(mapped field)}, \qquad U_g = \frac{Q}{\pi r^2}\ \text{(estimate)}
(1)
u∗=Ugλ/8,λ=0.306 Re−1/4,Re=UgDνu_* = U_g\sqrt{\lambda/8}, \qquad \lambda = 0.306\,Re^{-1/4}, \qquad Re = \frac{U_g D}{\nu}
(2)
wheremeaningunit
MgM_gGrazing Mach number-
UgU_gGrazing speedm/s
ccSpeed of sound of the local gasm/s
Ue,ne,Ae\mathbf{U}_e, \mathbf{n}_e, A_eMean velocity, unit normal and area of wall triangle em/s, -, m²
QQTotal inflowm³/s
rrRadius of the perforated tube (cylinder fit)m
u∗u_*Friction velocitym/s
DDTube diameter, or equivalent diameter of a platem

Default and rule

Default
auto: from the CFD (mapped field, else the perforate samples), else the entered flow through the tube, else 0Computed by the program
Rule

Auto. A typed number overrides every source.

Source

Friction velocity: Lee & Ih eqs. 26-29 (Lee and Ih, 2003). The order of the sources is the program's rule.

Valid range 0 ≤ M_g ≤ 0.6

Values

0 to 0.6.

Separate from the flow

The flow card's grazing Mach number (Grazing Mach number (flow)) is stored separately and does not change this value.

Model ranges

Lee & Ih: M ≤ 0.2; Kirby & Cummings: u* 0.48-2.19 m/s. Elnady et al. quote their grazing term from Bauer (1977) without a validity range.

References 3

  1. Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
  2. Kirby, R. and Cummings, A. (1998). The impedance of perforated plates subjected to grazing gas flow and backed by porous media. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 217(4), 619-636. DOI 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1811
  3. Lee, S.-H. and Ih, J.-G. (2003). Empirical model of the acoustic impedance of a circular orifice in grazing mean flow. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(1), 98-113. DOI 10.1121/1.1581280