Theory
The hole speed is the normal flow speed through the wall divided by the open-area ratio. On auto it is taken as follows.
Cross-flow model (always uses it):
- the net through-flow of the CFD's perforate samples, divided by (from the last loss-coefficient update of the flow run);
- else the total inflow divided by when the flow is on (perpendicular-baffle assumption: all of the flow crosses this wall);
- else 0 (acoustics only: enter the number).
Other models, with [[perforate.bias_flow]] on:
- the mapped CFD field: the area mean of over the wall, divided by (acoustic medium mapped from the CFD);
- else the mean hole speed of the CFD's perforate samples;
- else 0.
Without the bias-flow option (and for models other than cross-flow and Elnady's own term) the bias Mach number is 0. The cross-flow resistance is (Sullivan, 1979) (eq. 16, = mean hole speed / c), the bias resistance (Elnady et al., 2010).
Equations
| where | meaning | unit |
|---|---|---|
| Bias Mach number in the holes | - | |
| Open-area ratio | - | |
| Speed of sound of the local gas | m/s | |
| Mean velocity, unit normal, area of wall triangle e | m/s, -, m² | |
| Total inflow (or the net through-flow of the samples) | m³/s | |
| Area of the perforated wall | m² | |
| Discharge coefficient | - |
Default and rule
- Default
- auto: from the CFD in a flow + acoustics run (cross-flow model: net through-flow / (σA), or Q / (σA)); 0 in an acoustics-only runComputed by the program
- Rule
Auto. A typed number overrides every source.
- Source
Validation on the two-baffle test muffler at 0.0556 kg/s against a reference transmission loss with flow: the cross-flow model with M 0.041-0.053 gave an rms deviation of 2.5 dB (with the earlier resistance , 20 % lower than now; not repeated since); the Elnady model with grazing and bias flow (M_b 0.05-0.08) 3.0 dB. Bias resistance: (Elnady et al., 2010).
Valid range 0 ≤ M_b ≤ 0.6
Values
0 to 0.6.
Acoustics only
Without a flow solution the auto value is 0, which for the cross-flow model means the small no-flow resistance; enter the hole Mach number of the operating point.
Related 6
References 2
- Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
- Sullivan, J. W. (1979). A method for modeling perforated tube muffler components. II. Applications. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(3), 779-788. DOI 10.1121/1.383680