Theory
A jet leaving a sharp-edged hole contracts, so it carries less flow than the hole area multiplied by the ideal velocity; quantifies this reduction. For a thin plate is typically 0.6-0.7; in a thicker wall the jet partly reattaches inside the bore, which raises the coefficient.
On Auto, the program interpolates bilinearly, equation (1), in a table of measured steady-flow discharge coefficients:
- rows of wall thickness = 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm;
- columns of hole diameter from 0.6 to 5 mm;
- values between 0.72 and 0.91.
Outside the table the nearest edge value is used; the program never extrapolates beyond the table.
With the grazing correction enabled (Grazing correction), the coefficient applied on each face is : grazing flow lowers the coefficient, and as the grazing flow becomes small it returns to . In a flow + acoustics run the same value is used as the acoustic model's (Discharge coefficient C_D (acoustics)).
Equations
| where | meaning | unit |
|---|---|---|
| Table value at thickness row and diameter column bracketing | - | |
| Linear interpolation weights in and (clamped to the table) | - | |
| Open-area ratio | - | |
| Initial loss coefficient | - |
Default and rule
- Default
- Auto: interpolated in the hole-diameter × wall-thickness tableComputed by the program
- Rule
Auto (table interpolation). A value between 0.05 and 1 entered by the user overrides the table.
- Source
The table contains Elnady's measured DC-flow discharge coefficients as a function of hole diameter and wall thickness: Table 1 of Paper III (Elnady and Boden, 2004) of his doctoral thesis (Elnady, 2004); the related journal paper is (Elnady et al., 2010). The measured samples cover = 0.6-2.4 mm and = 0.8-2.4 mm; the remainder of the table is Elnady's extrapolation. The table values are not reproduced here; refer to the thesis.
Valid range 0.05 ≤ C_D0 ≤ 1
Values
0.05 to 1. A user value replaces the table for the CFD and, in a flow + acoustics run, for the acoustic model.
Extrapolated table cells
Outside = 0.6-2.4 mm or = 0.8-2.4 mm the table value is Elnady's extrapolation; the boundary-condition card indicates this.
Related 6
References 3
- Elnady, T. (2004). Modelling and characterization of perforates in lined ducts and mufflers. Doctoral thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (Paper III, Table 1). Web page
- Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
- Elnady, T. and Boden, H. (2004). On the modelling of the acoustic impedance of perforates with flow. Paper III of T. Elnady, Modelling and characterization of perforates in lined ducts and mufflers, doctoral thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. Web page