SpectraSim Documentation
Parameter · 05 Boundary Conditions

Acoustic (poroacoustic) model of the packing

Selects how the acoustic solver represents an absorptive packing: as an equivalent fluid with a complex, frequency-dependent density and bulk modulus. The three empirical models need only the flow resistivity; the JCA and JCAL models need four or five material parameters; "user defined" takes the eight constants of your own fit.

Last updated

Theory

A rigid-frame fibrous packing behaves acoustically like a lossy fluid. The acoustic finite-element model assigns the packing elements the equivalent density ρeq\rho_{eq} and bulk modulus KeqK_{eq} of the selected model, both complex and frequency dependent (time dependence e+iωte^{+i\omega t}). The packing domain is coupled to the gas either directly or through a perforated wall.

Empirical models (Delany-Bazley, Miki, Komatsu). The characteristic impedance ZcZ_c and the propagation constant kck_c are power laws in one dimensionless variable XX, equations (1)-(3), with eight constants C1…C8C_1 \dots C_8 per model (shown read-only on the card).

  • Delany-Bazley (Delany and Bazley, 1970) and Miki (Miki, 1990) use X=ρ0f/RX = \rho_0 f/R.
  • Komatsu (Komatsu, 2008) uses X=2−log⁡10(f/R)X = 2 - \log_{10}(f/R).
  • Miki's modification of the Delany-Bazley fit remains physically realisable (positive real impedance) below its data range; Komatsu's model improves the fit at very low and very high f/Rf/R.

The constants are the published coefficients converted to the X=ρ0f/RX = \rho_0 f/R form with the air density of the original measurements, 1.2 kg/m³, as tabulated by Komatsu (2008).

JCA and JCAL (Johnson et al., 1987), (Champoux and Allard, 1991), (Lafarge et al., 1997) are semi-phenomenological models based on the pore geometry: Porosity (JCA / JCAL) ϕ\phi, Tortuosity (JCA / JCAL) α∞\alpha_\infty, Viscous characteristic length (JCA / JCAL) Λ\Lambda, Thermal characteristic length (JCA / JCAL) Λ′\Lambda' and, for JCAL, Static thermal permeability (JCAL) k0′k'_0, together with the flow resistivity, equations (4)-(5). The gas properties (η\eta, γ\gamma, P0P_0, Pr) are those of the local gas, so these models remain valid in hot exhaust gas, unlike the empirical fits, which were measured in room-temperature air. JCA is JCAL with k0′=ϕΛ′2/8k'_0 = \phi\Lambda'^2/8.

User defined applies equations (1)-(2) with the constants User constant C1 ... C8 and the variable Variable X of the user constants of your own fit; no validity range is checked.

In every model ρ0\rho_0 and c0c_0 (and, for JCA/JCAL, η\eta, γ\gamma, P0P_0) are those of the gas in the packing at its local temperature (the domain mean of a medium mapped from the CFD), and RR is the resistivity scaled to that temperature (see Flow resistivity).

Equations

Zc=ρ0c0[1+C5X−C6−i C7X−C8]Z_c = \rho_0 c_0\left[1 + C_5 X^{-C_6} - i\,C_7 X^{-C_8}\right]
(1)
kc=ωc0[1+C1X−C2−i C3X−C4]k_c = \frac{\omega}{c_0}\left[1 + C_1 X^{-C_2} - i\,C_3 X^{-C_4}\right]
(2)
ρeq=Zckcω,Keq=ωZckc,X=ρ0fR  or  X=2−log⁡10fR\rho_{eq} = \frac{Z_c k_c}{\omega}, \qquad K_{eq} = \frac{\omega Z_c}{k_c}, \qquad X = \frac{\rho_0 f}{R}\ \ \text{or}\ \ X = 2 - \log_{10}\frac{f}{R}
(3)
wheremeaningunit
ZcZ_cCharacteristic impedance of the packingPa·s/m
kck_cComplex propagation constant1/m
ρ0,c0\rho_0, c_0Density and sound speed of the gas in the packingkg/m³, m/s
f,ωf, \omegaFrequency, angular frequency 2πf2\pi fHz, rad/s
RRFlow resistivity at the local temperaturePa·s/m²
C1…C8C_1 \dots C_8Model constants: Delany-Bazley 0.0978, 0.7, 0.189, 0.595, 0.0571, 0.754, 0.087, 0.732; Miki 0.122, 0.618, 0.18, 0.618, 0.079, 0.632, 0.12, 0.632; Komatsu 0.0004, -6.2, 0.0069, -4.1, 0.00027, -6.2, 0.0047, -4.1-
ρeq=α∞ρ0ϕ[1+R ϕiωρ0α∞1+i 4α∞2ηρ0ωR2Λ2ϕ2]\rho_{eq} = \frac{\alpha_\infty\rho_0}{\phi}\left[1 + \frac{R\,\phi}{i\omega\rho_0\alpha_\infty}\sqrt{1 + i\,\frac{4\alpha_\infty^2\eta\rho_0\omega}{R^2\Lambda^2\phi^2}}\right]
(4)
Keq=γP0/ϕγ−(γ−1)[1−i ϕ η/Prk0′ρ0ω1+i 4k0′2ρ0ω(η/Pr)Λ′2ϕ2]−1K_{eq} = \frac{\gamma P_0/\phi}{\gamma - (\gamma - 1)\left[1 - i\,\dfrac{\phi\,\eta/\mathrm{Pr}}{k'_0\rho_0\omega}\sqrt{1 + i\,\dfrac{4 k_0'^2\rho_0\omega}{(\eta/\mathrm{Pr})\Lambda'^2\phi^2}}\right]^{-1}}
(5)
wheremeaningunit
ϕ\phiOpen porosity-
α∞\alpha_\inftyHigh-frequency tortuosity-
Λ,Λ′\Lambda, \Lambda'Viscous and thermal characteristic lengthsm
k0′k'_0Static thermal permeability (JCA: ϕΛ′2/8\phi\Lambda'^2/8)m²
η\etaDynamic viscosity of the gasPa·s
γ\gammaRatio of specific heats of the gas, c2ρ/pc^2\rho/p-
P0P_0Absolute pressure of the gasPa
Pr\mathrm{Pr}Prandtl number (material setting)-

Default and rule

Default
Miki
Rule

Miki. It needs only the flow resistivity and, unlike Delany-Bazley, remains physically realisable outside its fitted band.

Source

The constants and validity ranges of the empirical models are the published coefficients as tabulated in Komatsu (2008) (Tables 1-2 and eqs. (15)-(18)), consistent with Delany and Bazley (1970) and Miki (1990). The JCA/JCAL equations follow the formulation of Atalla and Panneton (2000), against which they are checked term by term.

Validation results:

  • JCA: the measured absorption of the foam of Atalla and Panneton (2000) is reproduced within 0.08 at six frequencies.
  • A packed annulus in the 3-D acoustic solver agrees within 0.45 dB with a 1-D coupled-line solution using the same ρeq\rho_{eq} and KeqK_{eq}.

Valid range Delany-Bazley | Miki | Komatsu | JCA | JCAL | user defined

Validity of the empirical models

Delany-Bazley and Miki: 0.012<ρ0f/R<1.20.012 < \rho_0 f/R < 1.2 (the original 0.01-1 m³/kg in air of 1.2 kg/m³); Komatsu: 0.001<f/R<10.001 < f/R < 1 m³/kg. The acoustic QA gate lists frequencies outside these ranges as a warning; the models are never extrapolated silently.

Hot gas

The three empirical models are fits to room-temperature air at porosity near 1. In hot gas ρ0\rho_0 changes XX for Delany-Bazley and Miki; Komatsu's XX contains no ρ0\rho_0. JCA/JCAL use the local gas properties directly.

Rigid frame

All models assume a motionless fibre skeleton; a limp or elastic frame (foams at low frequency) is not modelled.

JCA / JCAL

Checked in a full acoustic run (2026-11-11): every quality check passes; within about 1 dB of Miki below 1 kHz with estimated parameters.

References 7

  1. Atalla, Y. and Panneton, R. (2000). Inverse characterization of the geometrical macroscopic parameters of porous materials. Canadian Acoustics, 28(3), 80-81. Web page
  2. Champoux, Y. and Allard, J.-F. (1991). Dynamic tortuosity and bulk modulus in air-saturated porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 70(4), 1975-1979. DOI 10.1063/1.349482
  3. Delany, M. E. and Bazley, E. N. (1970). Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. Applied Acoustics, 3(2), 105-116. DOI 10.1016/0003-682X(70)90031-9
  4. Johnson, D. L., Koplik, J. and Dashen, R. (1987). Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 176, 379-402. DOI 10.1017/S0022112087000727
  5. Komatsu, T. (2008). Improvement of the Delany-Bazley and Miki models for fibrous sound-absorbing materials. Acoustical Science and Technology, 29(2), 121-129. DOI 10.1250/ast.29.121
  6. Lafarge, D., Lemarinier, P., Allard, J. F. and Tarnow, V. (1997). Dynamic compressibility of air in porous structures at audible frequencies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(4), 1995-2006. DOI 10.1121/1.419690
  7. Miki, Y. (1990). Acoustical properties of porous materials: modifications of Delany-Bazley models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 11(1), 19-24. DOI 10.1250/ast.11.19