SpectraSim Documentation
Parameter · 05 Boundary Conditions

Discharge coefficient C_D (acoustics)

perforate.discharge_coefficient Step 05 · Boundary Conditions

The ratio of the effective to the geometric open area of the holes. Flow through a sharp-edged hole contracts to a vena contracta, so the hole behaves as if it were smaller. The coefficient is used by the Elnady impedance model, by the thin-plate option "use C_D" and by the bias-flow term.

Last updated

Theory

Because the jet issuing from a sharp-edged hole is narrower than the hole, the effective open-area ratio of the plate is σCD\sigma C_D. The coefficient enters the acoustic models as follows:

  • Elnady model (Elnady et al., 2010): the complete hole impedance (viscous tube term and end corrections) is divided by CDC_D.
  • Bias flow: the added resistance is 1.15 Mb/CD1.15\,M_b/C_D, equation (1).
  • Thin-plate physics baseline: the hole impedance is divided by CDC_D when Thin plate: use C_D is enabled.

On Auto, the program interpolates CDC_D bilinearly in a table of hole diameter (0.6-5 mm) and wall thickness (0.5-2.5 mm), equation (2). Outside the table the nearest edge value is used and a note is written to the report.

In a CFD + acoustics case with a perforated tube, the coefficient is entered once, on the flow section of the card (Discharge coefficient C_D0). The same value then also sets the steady-flow loss coefficient K=1/(σCD)2K = 1/(\sigma C_D)^2.

Equations

ζh∝1CD[ik tF(K′d)+ik δ fintF(Kd)],θbias=1.15 MbCD\zeta_h \propto \frac{1}{C_D}\left[\frac{ik\,t}{F(K'd)} + \frac{ik\,\delta\,f_{int}}{F(Kd)}\right], \qquad \theta_{bias} = \frac{1.15\,M_b}{C_D}
(1)
CD=(1−ft)(1−fd) Ti,j+(1−ft)fd Ti,j+1+ft(1−fd) Ti+1,j+ftfd Ti+1,j+1C_D = (1 - f_t)(1 - f_d)\,T_{i,j} + (1 - f_t)f_d\,T_{i,j+1} + f_t(1 - f_d)\,T_{i+1,j} + f_t f_d\,T_{i+1,j+1}
(2)
wheremeaningunit
CDC_DDischarge coefficient-
MbM_bBias (through-hole) Mach number-
Ti,jT_{i,j}Table value at thickness row i, diameter column j-
ft,fdf_t, f_dFractional position of t and d between the bracketing table rows and columns-

Default and rule

Default
Auto: bilinear interpolation in the hole-diameter × wall-thickness tableComputed by the program
Rule

Auto (table interpolation). A value entered by the user is applied unchanged in every model that uses CDC_D.

Source

The table contains the DC-flow discharge coefficients measured by Elnady as a function of hole diameter and wall thickness: Table 1 of Paper III (Elnady and Boden, 2004) of his doctoral thesis (Elnady, 2004). The measurements cover hole diameters of 0.6-2.4 mm and wall thicknesses of 0.8-2.4 mm; the remainder of the table is Elnady's extrapolation, which shows that above a hole diameter of 2.5 mm CDC_D depends on the wall thickness only. The table values are not reproduced here; refer to the thesis. The way CDC_D enters the hole impedance follows (Elnady et al., 2010), equations (6)-(7).

Valid range 0.05 ≤ C_D ≤ 1

Values

0.05 to 1. The table values lie between approximately 0.7 and 0.9.

Extrapolated values

For hole diameters outside 0.6-2.4 mm or wall thicknesses outside 0.8-2.4 mm, the table value is an extrapolation. Outside the table limits the edge value is used, and the report says so.

References 3

  1. Elnady, T. (2004). Modelling and characterization of perforates in lined ducts and mufflers. Doctoral thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (Paper III, Table 1). Web page
  2. Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
  3. Elnady, T. and Boden, H. (2004). On the modelling of the acoustic impedance of perforates with flow. Paper III of T. Elnady, Modelling and characterization of perforates in lined ducts and mufflers, doctoral thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. Web page